Call of Duty: 4 v 5

[UltimaLink007]

I plan to get both, and currently own Call of Duty 4, but haven't had the chance to touch it yet. Which should I play first, which one is better, etc. Super-Happy-Fun-Discussion-That-Will-Probably-Get-No-Actual-Input-Or-Discussion GO!

 

[yoyolll]

Modern warfare is so boring. Armies just stand behind cover and every once in a while you hear a sniper shot. And also, modern warfare shooters are almost always too realistic, meaning that one shot is death and you have a squad with you who can die and must be revived. WW2 shooters is where its at.

 

[UltimaLink007]

Well, I ended up getting Call of Duty 4 for free, so no problem there really, even if it does suck. I should really try playing it... After Godfather perhaps. I should get a bunch of games done before Final Fantasy XIII comes out and consumes my entire being. Now I just need to wait for a good deal on Call of Duty: World at War...

 

[Capt. Zeroth]

EH, I hear COD4 is better than 5. When I got my XBOX, all of my friends told me to get 4 because 5 sucks. I dont kow why, never really played it. COD4 is a lot of fun though, but you may get bored of it after a while. But don't bother buying 5.

 

[almundo]

There's one distinct reason why I like WaW better.

and that is.....

NAZI ZOMBIES!!!!!!!!

 

[yoyolll]

Why didn't you just play Wolfenstein then?

 

[teh hippie]

You lose your life to these games. DON'T PLAY THEM